![]()
ISSN 0974-3618
(Print) www.rjptonline.org
0974-360X (Online
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effectiveness of Structured Teaching
Programme on Knowledge of Women Regarding Cancer Cervix
Mrs. C. Jegatha1, Prof Mrs. V. Hemavathy2, Mrs. KR. Vasanthakohila2
1Associate
Professor, Sree Balaji College of Nursing Bharath University No. 7. C.L.C.
Works Road, Chromepet, Chennai
2Professor,
Department of Community Health Nursing, Sree Balaji College of Nursing Bharath
University No.7. C.L.C. Works Road, Chromepet, Chennai
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
ABSTRACT:
The study was conducted to evaluate
effectiveness of structured Teaching Programme on knowledge of Women regarding
early detection and Prevention of Cancer Cervix
KEYWORDS: Effectiveness, Knowledge, women, Cervical
cancer
INTRODUCTION:
A great number of
people are living to older age and are at greater risk to chronic disease of
various kind. Out of all chronic disease, Benson Raiph (2002) reported, cancer
is a Feared and dreaded disease for several reasons cancer, the very utterance
of the word sends a shiver down our spine. It spells pain, agony, despair,
gloom and death. Frederickson
Helen.et.al (2005) evaluated, it is the 9th most common
cancer in women in Ireland, with almost 200 women on average developing the
disease every year. Dutta DC (2006)
revealed contrast to most other cancers, cancer of the cervix affects mainly
younger women, with 60% of cases occurring in women aged 50 or younger. Holland James. F. et.al (2003) assessed
approximately 70 women in the Republic die from cervical cancer each year.
However, cervical cancer can be prevented by means of a simple test – the
cervical smear test.
Received on 05.02.2015 Modified on 20.02.2015
Accepted on 25.02.2015 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(3)
: Mar., 2015; Page 335-338
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00055.4
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
We have chosen 60 women in
between the age group of 35 to 55
years community area. The research
design used for this study is Pre
experimental design of one group pretest and post test design
|
Pre test |
Treatment (STP) |
Post test |
|
Q1 |
X |
Q2 |
The dependent variables is
knowledge of cervical cancer among women, the independent variable is
structured teaching programme. According to systems theory a system is a group
of elements that interacts with one
another in order to achieve the goal. The component interacts with in a
boundary and filters the type and rate of exchange with the environment.
Input
In this study, the input is structured
teaching programme regarding general aspects, risk factors, signs and symptoms,
early detection and prevention of cancer cervix among women.
Throughput
In this study throughput is a
process of change in knowledge and understanding about the various aspects of
cancer cervix among women.
Output
Output is the outcome of
structured teaching programme, which is change in knowledge after structured
teaching programme, which will be measured by the post test using the same
questionnaire used in the pretest.
Feed Back
Feedback is the emphasis to
strengthen the input and throughout it is necessary if results show any
inadequate knowledge
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
The present study
was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Structured teaching programme on
cervical cancer among women in between the age group of 35 to 55 years. Pre experimental design of
one group pretest and post test design was adopted. The sample was selected by
using purposive sampling technique

Fig
1: Conceptual Framework Based on General
System Model (Von Ludwig Bertalanffy) -
1968
Table 1: Frequency and
percentage distribution of demographic variables
|
S. No. |
Variables |
|
Groups |
(n=60) No. |
% |
|
1. |
Age
(yrs) |
a. |
35 –
40 |
13 |
21.7 |
|
b. |
41 –
45 |
28 |
46.7 |
||
|
c. |
46 –
50 |
10 |
16.6 |
||
|
d. |
Above
50 |
9 |
15.0 |
||
|
2. |
Martial
status |
a. |
Married |
56 |
93.3 |
|
b. |
Unmarried |
0 |
- |
||
|
c. |
Widows |
3 |
5.0 |
||
|
d. |
Single |
1 |
1.7 |
||
|
3. |
Educational
status |
a. |
Illiterate |
14 |
23.3 |
|
b. |
Primary
& middle school |
17 |
28.3 |
||
|
c. |
High
& Higher secondary school |
17 |
28.3 |
||
|
d. |
Graduates |
12 |
20.1 |
||
|
4. |
Religion |
a. |
Hindu |
36 |
60.0 |
|
b. |
Christian |
18 |
30.0 |
||
|
c. |
Muslim |
6 |
10.0 |
||
|
5. |
Monthly
Income(Rs.) |
a. |
1000-2000 |
18 |
30.0 |
|
b. |
2001-3000 |
22 |
36.7 |
||
|
c. |
3001-4000 |
8 |
13.3 |
||
|
d. |
4001and
above |
12 |
20.0 |
||
|
6. |
Source
of Health information |
a. |
Health
staff |
13 |
21.7 |
|
b. |
Television
/ Radio |
29 |
48.3 |
||
|
c. |
Newspaper |
17 |
28.3 |
||
|
d. |
Neighbours |
1 |
1.7 |
||
|
7. |
Husband’s
occupation |
a. |
Labourer |
20 |
33.3 |
|
b. |
Government
employee |
4 |
6.7 |
||
|
c. |
Private
employee |
16 |
26.7 |
||
|
d. |
Business |
20 |
33.3 |
||
|
8. |
Parity |
a. |
Nil |
2 |
3.3 |
|
b. |
One |
23 |
38.3 |
||
|
c. |
Two |
28 |
46.7 |
||
|
d. |
≥
Three |
7 |
11.7 |
||
|
9. |
Family
history of cervical cancer |
a. |
Grand
mother |
2 |
3.3 |
|
b. |
Mother |
0 |
- |
||
|
c. |
Sister |
1 |
1.7 |
||
|
d. |
None |
57 |
95.0 |
Table.2.Classification
of women according to demographic variables and pre-test knowledge level
|
Variable |
Knowledge level (N=60) |
X2 (df=1) |
P |
|||||
|
Low |
Moderate |
High |
||||||
|
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
|||
|
i) Age (yrs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35-40 |
8 |
61.5 |
5 |
38.5 |
- |
- |
3.5 |
0.6 |
|
41-45 |
21 |
75.0 |
7 |
25.0 |
- |
- |
||
|
46-50 |
10 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Above
50 |
9 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
ii) Martial Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Married |
45 |
80.4 |
11 |
19.6 |
- |
- |
0.07 |
0.7 |
|
Widow |
2 |
66.7 |
1 |
33.3 |
- |
- |
||
|
Single |
1 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
iii) Education |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illiterate |
14 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16.0 (S) |
0.0001 |
|
Primary
/ Middle |
17 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
High
School |
17 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
College |
- |
- |
12 |
100 |
- |
- |
||
|
iv) Religion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hindu |
32 |
88.9 |
4 |
11.1 |
- |
- |
4.4 (S) |
0.03 |
|
Christian |
12 |
66.7 |
6 |
33.3 |
- |
- |
||
|
Muslim |
4 |
66.7 |
2 |
33.3 |
- |
- |
||
|
v)Monthly Income(Rs.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000-2000 |
17 |
94.4 |
1 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
1.9 |
0.2 |
|
2001-3000 |
17 |
77.3 |
5 |
22.7 |
- |
- |
||
|
3001-4000 |
3 |
37.5 |
5 |
62.5 |
- |
- |
||
|
>4000 |
11 |
91.7 |
1 |
8.3 |
- |
- |
||
|
vi) Source of Health Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
staff |
12 |
92.3 |
1 |
7.7 |
- |
- |
9.6 (S) |
0.002 |
|
TV /
Radio |
26 |
89.7 |
3 |
10.3 |
- |
- |
||
|
News
paper |
10 |
58.8 |
7 |
41.2 |
- |
- |
||
|
Neighbours |
- |
- |
1 |
100 |
- |
- |
||
|
Vii)Husband’s Occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labourer |
19 |
95.0 |
1 |
5.0 |
- |
- |
3.4 |
0.07 |
|
Govt.
job |
3 |
75.0 |
1 |
25.0 |
- |
- |
||
|
Private
job |
11 |
68.8 |
5 |
31.2 |
- |
- |
||
|
Business |
15 |
75.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
- |
- |
||
|
viii) Parity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
1 |
19 |
82.6 |
4 |
17.4 |
- |
- |
||
|
2 |
20 |
71.4 |
8 |
28.6 |
- |
- |
||
|
≥3 |
7 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
ix)Family History of CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr.
Mother |
- |
- |
1 |
100 |
- |
- |
1.2 |
0.3 |
|
Sister |
1 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
No |
47 |
81.0 |
11 |
19.0 |
- |
- |
||
The variables which showed association with
pre-test knowledge level were: Education, Religion and Source of Health
Information. Dawn Os et. al. (2005)
conducted a study about prevention of carcinoma on cervix with human papilloma virus vaccine
based on experimental evidence stated that it is possible to prevent carcinoma
of cervix with human papillomavirus vaccine.
Table 3. Comparison between pre-test and post-test knowledge level
of women on early detection and prevention of cancer cervix
|
Knowledge level |
Pre-test |
Post-test |
||
|
No |
% |
No. |
% |
|
|
Inadequate (0-49%) |
48 |
80.0 |
- |
- |
|
Moderate adequate (50-74%) |
12 |
20.0 |
32 |
53.3 |
|
Adequate (≥ 75%) |
- |
- |
28 |
46.7 |
|
Total |
60 |
100 |
60 |
100 |
Among 60 women 48(80.0%) had low level of
knowledge in pre-test and no one had low level of knowledge in post-test.
12(20.0%) of women had moderate level of knowledge in pre-test and 32(53.3%)
had moderate level of knowledge in post-test. No one had high level of
knowledge in pre-test and 28(46.7%) had high level of knowledge in post-test.
So the structured teaching programme was effective in the sample respondents.
Table 4. Mean and
Standard Deviation of Pre test and post test Scores of early detection and
prevention of cancer cervix
|
Variables |
Pretest score |
Post test score |
Paired ‘t’ test |
||
|
Mean |
S.D |
Mean |
S.D |
||
|
Knowledge |
32.4 |
14.8 |
73.7 |
12.3 |
27.6*** |
*** P<0.001
statistically significant.
The pre test knowledge mean value with 32.4
with a standard deviation of 14.8 and the post test mean value was 73.7 with
the standard deviation of 12.3 of the women on early detection and prevention
of cancer cervix. The paired ‘t’ test value is 27.6*** which is highly
significant at ***p<0.001 level.
CONCLUSION:
The present study assessed the
effectiveness of structured teaching programme on cervical cancer among women. After structured teaching programme
was accepted the knowledge of the middle aged women on cancer cervix before structured
teaching programme was in-adequate. It was adequate after structured teaching
programme. So educating the middle aged women regarding early detection and
prevention of cancer cervix will helps to prevent the mortality and morbidity
rate of middle aged women.
REFERENCES:
1.
Benson Raiph C, “Handbook of
Obstetrics and Gynecology”, Marcizen Asian Edition, Lange
Medical; Publications; 2002. Dawn O.S, “Text Book of Genecology”,
Calcutta S.M. Arabi Dawn, 2005.
2.
Dutta DC, “Text Book of
Gynecology”, Calcutta, New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd., 2006.
3.
Frederickson Helen L. et. al., “Obstetrics
and Gynecology Secrets”, New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers, 2005.
4.
Holland James F. et.al., “Cancer
Nursing”, London; Len and Febiger 2003 Park J.E. et.al. “Parks
Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine”, India, M/s Banarsidas
Bhanot Publishers 2007.
5.
Polit Denise F. “Nursing Research
Principles and Methods”, New York Philadelphia 2002.
6.
Rao Bhaskjar K, et.al., “Clinical
Gynecology”, India, Orient Longman, 2003.
7.
Revathi Ramakrishnan, “Clinical
Gynecology”, Toronto, W.B. Saundars Company, 2004.
8.
Shaw Robert W. et. al., “Gynecology”,
Toronto, Churchill Livingstone, 2001.
9.
Browne Mc Clure J.C, “Post
Graduates Obstetrics and Gynecology”, Butter Worths, 1994.
10.
Buckley Kathleen et.al., “High Risk
Maternity Nursing Manual”, William and Wilkins, 1993.
11.
Burns Narxy et, al., “The Practice
of Nursing”, London, W.B. Sounders Company, 1999.
12.
Clement Rogers. V, “Safe Practice
in Obstetrics and Gynecology”, New York; Longman group limited, 1994.
13.
WWW.google.com
14.
www.pubmed.com.